Media Monitor

{"contentId":"3464695","authorDomain":"SteveAdubato"}

A New Governor...Now What?

The nation's eyes were on New Jersey Tuesday night, and New Jersey didn't disappoint. In a shocking victory, former US Attorney Chris Christie beat the odds, as well as a $30 million plus campaign from Governor Jon Corzine, and a nonstop series of visits from President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, former President Bill Clinton and every other Democratic luminary under the sun.

Christie didn't run a picture perfect campaign, yet he stuck to his guns and simply made the case, as he said toward the end of the campaign, "I can't do any worse" than Jon Corzine. Most voters bought that argument. Governor Corzine had become extremely unpopular. It didn't matter how many times President Obama came in to rally the Democratic troops and get massive media attention to Governor Corzine. It didn't matter how much of Corzine's personal fortune he was willing to spend (a combined total of $125 million from one US Senate race and two gubernatorial races) on destroying Chris Christie's reputation. There was no way Jon Corzine was going to win this race.

It didn't even matter that the Democrats got embarrassed in the last few days of this race when they got caught sending so-called "robocalls" promoting the candidacy of Independent candidate Chris Daggett, who in effect was simply drawing votes away from Chris Christie. In the end, Daggett wasn't a factor at all. He only got six percent of the vote, nowhere near the 15 to 20 percent some pollsters were projecting.

Most people didn't want to waste their vote on a guy who couldn't win, and instead opted to vote for Christie because they just wanted to get rid of Corzine. Don't get me wrong, I've always thought of Corzine as a decent guy with a good heart, but he let his campaign run out of control. There was probably nothing he could have done to save his political hide and win this race, but he never should have allowed his campaign handlers to run that absurdly offensive ad about Chris Christie "throwing his weight around."

How lame is it when nearly 10 percent of the people in our state are unemployed, property taxes are the highest in the nation, and we have an $8 billion budget gap, that the governor's campaign decides the biggest issue they can hit Christie on is that he is overweight, and then not even own up to the fact that they did it? It was a disgrace and frankly beneath Jon Corzine.

Sure, Chris Christie is going to have to come up with more specifics in a hurry as to how he is going to close this massive budget deficit, increase the property tax rebate, cut the size of state government, etc. But, most New Jerseyans were willing to take a shot with him. They were willing to believe that his aggressive personality and style would be better for the state than Corzine's more laid back and hands-off approach. Simply put, Corzine being a nice guy was nice, but wasn't nearly enough to deal with the serious problems in our state.

As governor, Corzine needed to take a harder line. He needed to kick some butt in the state legislature when they wouldn't move on his top agenda items. In the campaign, he needed to be a more persuasive communicator. He needed to talk directly to people in simple clear language about just exactly how bad the situation was and what he was going to do about it. That was the only type of campaign that could have won. But instead, he opted—based on cynical so-called political conventional wisdom—that he had to destroy Christie and his reputation in order to win re-election. That was not to the governor's credit.

By saying Christie was corrupt, couldn't be trusted, was a clone of George Bush, gave away no bid contracts to friends and, of course, was overweight, it only pointed to how out of touch the governor was to what voters really wanted to hear; "What was Jon Corzine going to do in the next four years to improve the economic situation in our state?"

He refused to do it, and he paid dearly. As for Christie, like I said, he made mistakes in this campaign (first time candidates will do that), but I've know him for a long time and he is the kind of person who learns from those mistakes. He will be open to criticism and feedback. But most of all, Christie is a "Jersey guy" who is tough and rough and will hopefully be willing to engage New Jersey voters in a more direct and candid fashion. I enjoy interviewing Chris Christie because he gives as good as he takes. He enjoys a spirited and healthy debate.

As governor, hopefully he will tell us what our problems are and what he believes needs to be done to move forward. Sure, he needs to listen, but he also needs to set a clear course and stick to it. That's what he did in the campaign despite all the criticism he received. (Including at times from this commentator.) I'm hopeful that is the kind of governor Christie will be in these most difficult times in the Garden State.

Write to me at sadubato@aol.com with what you think is the number one issue or challenge Chris Christie should take on as governor and why.

{"contentId":"3464695","authorDomain":"SteveAdubato"}
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
{"commentId":10569612,"authorDomain":"js-145936"}

Steve: But what did Tuesday's election say about the quite uninformed and fickle voters of New Jersey? No onewants to face up to certain facts: 1) There is no concept of metropolitan government in this state. Every town wants its own mayor, city administration, school districts, fire departments, cops, etc, but you can't have that and keep property taxes down, too. No one wants to share services with the next town only a mile away. Why does Bergen county have more fire trucks than New York City with 8 times the population? 2) How can we have metropolitan government when we allow 25% - 33% of the members of our state legislature (the number varies over time) to be dual office holders in their own towns (double salaries, double healthcare benefits -- sometimes for LIFE, and double pensions, too). Won't be too much support for sharing services from those politicians. 3) The public forgot the treachery of the last Republican governor, Whitman, who, in order to court favor with the public, cut state tax rates by 1/3, tried to cover the ensuing deficit by looting the state pension funds by billions of dollars, invested that money in Wall Street and lost every penny of it. Of course she'd set it up so that none of it had to be paid back to the state pension funds until long AFTER she'd left office (which may explain why she grabbed the EPA lifeline that George Bush threw her way so she could get out of town before the public ever figured-out the mess she'd made). Corzine got stuck with the potential repayments to the retirement funds -- and the deficits inflamed by that -- the day he first took office. He was doomed from the start. That's the kind of political know-nothingism we've got in this state. And now we've let the Republican hacks back in. This won't get any better. The public has itself to blame for being either 1) Too uncaring to bother to vote on Tuesday and/or 2) Too eager to forget/too uninformed to know who is really at fault. JS

{"commentId":10569612,"threadId":"719953","contentId":"3464695","authorDomain":"js-145936"}
    Reply#1 - Mon Nov 9, 2009 4:31 AM EST
    {"canLink":false,"threadId":"719953","isPrivate":false}
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    {"threadId":"719953","contentId":"3464695"}
    Start TrackingStart Tracking
    Stop TrackingStop Tracking
    RSS feedSyndicate this contentRecent Articles & Seeds
    Steve Adubato, Ph.D.'s Latest Comments
    No comments have been posted yet.
    Steve Adubato, Ph.D.'s Recent Votes
    Steve Adubato, Ph.D. has not voted for any articles or seeds yet.
    Comments & Feedback